I received this very good question in one of the comments:
Do you think Blender is as good as 3D max for professional 3D renderings?
Mike,
dk.lazyanimation.com
And my answer:
Mike,
Your question is a very good one, but I am really not the person to ask. However, I will try to give you a good answer nonetheless.
As you well know, the quality of the final render lies heavily upon the work done in the modeling/animation application prior to the rendering. The detail of textures, proper placement of lamps, and correct shading and maps all play into getting the stunning result we all want.
Blender’s internal renderer may (or may not) render as high quality results as 3DS Max – I do not have experience with 3DS Max – but Blender’s internal renderer results are definitely satisfactory for general usage.
With the use of an external renderer such as Yaf(a)Ray or Indigo you can achieve higher realism in your photo-realistic renders, and with a program such as Freestyle (coding for the integration with Blender is still in progress as far as I know,) you can create artistic stroke renderings as well. I have also heard of another photo-realistic renderer called Pixie.
Now onto your question directly:
“Do you think Blender is as good as 3D max for professional 3D renderings?”
Is Blender as good as 3DS Max for professional 3D renderings? I don’t know, but I would say a big “yes.”
Give Blender a try, learn online with all the great tutorials out there, and you will soon see that Blender is a very capable program. I highly recommend it!
To find out more of what Blender can do, see the features page (and also see the new features for the 2.48a release,) and check out the image gallery (I do not like some of the images here for various reasons, but I hope you will be OK with them.)
If you have any more questions, feel free to ask! I am welcome to answering your questions.
God bless and best wishes!
-b
P.S. All of the above programs that I have listed are open source.
Is Blender as good as 3DS Max for professional 3D renderings?
October 27, 2008I received this very good question in one of the comments:
And my answer:
Mike,
Your question is a very good one, but I am really not the person to ask. However, I will try to give you a good answer nonetheless.
As you well know, the quality of the final render lies heavily upon the work done in the modeling/animation application prior to the rendering. The detail of textures, proper placement of lamps, and correct shading and maps all play into getting the stunning result we all want.
Blender’s internal renderer may (or may not) render as high quality results as 3DS Max – I do not have experience with 3DS Max – but Blender’s internal renderer results are definitely satisfactory for general usage.
With the use of an external renderer such as Yaf(a)Ray or Indigo you can achieve higher realism in your photo-realistic renders, and with a program such as Freestyle (coding for the integration with Blender is still in progress as far as I know,) you can create artistic stroke renderings as well. I have also heard of another photo-realistic renderer called Pixie.
Now onto your question directly:
Is Blender as good as 3DS Max for professional 3D renderings? I don’t know, but I would say a big “yes.”
Give Blender a try, learn online with all the great tutorials out there, and you will soon see that Blender is a very capable program. I highly recommend it!
To find out more of what Blender can do, see the features page (and also see the new features for the 2.48a release,) and check out the image gallery (I do not like some of the images here for various reasons, but I hope you will be OK with them.)
If you have any more questions, feel free to ask! I am welcome to answering your questions.
God bless and best wishes!
-b
P.S. All of the above programs that I have listed are open source.
Posted in 3D, blender, Open Source, Professional, real-life | Tagged 3D Max, 3DS Max, Autodesk, blender, comment, Indigo, Lazy Animation, Mike, photorealistic, Pixie, Professional, question, rendeirng, render, Yaf(a)Ray, YafRay | 2 Comments »